{"id":959,"date":"2020-06-18T08:34:59","date_gmt":"2020-06-18T08:34:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/lexington\/titre-de-larticle-sur-une-ligne-7\/"},"modified":"2021-05-27T10:35:38","modified_gmt":"2021-05-27T10:35:38","slug":"preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/","title":{"rendered":"Preuve d’actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Commentaire de la d\u00e9cision de principe de la Cour de Cassation, 19 mars 2020, n\u00b019-11.323<\/strong><\/h1>\n

Par une d\u00e9cision de principe du 19 mars 2020 (n\u00b019-11.323), qui fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une triple publication (P+B+I), la Cour de Cassation donne un \u00e9clairage int\u00e9ressant sur la r\u00e9partition des pouvoirs respectifs entre juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s et juge des requ\u00eates : \u00ab\u00a0<\/span>seul le juge des requ\u00eates qui a rendu l\u2019ordonnance peut \u00eatre saisi d\u2019une demande de r\u00e9tractation de celle-ci<\/span><\/i>\u00a0\u00bb.<\/span><\/p>\n

Si la r\u00e8gle en elle-m\u00eame n\u2019est pas totalement nouvelle, le contexte proc\u00e9dural est in\u00e9dit.<\/span><\/p>\n

Les faits et la proc\u00e9dure \u00e9taient les suivants : \u00e0 la demande de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de contr\u00f4le technique automobile Autovision, assist\u00e9e dans la proc\u00e9dure au fond par Ebl Lexington Avocats, le juge des requ\u00eates a autoris\u00e9 un huissier \u00e0 se rendre chez un concurrent, auquel il \u00e9tait reproch\u00e9 des actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale, pour en rechercher des preuves.<\/span><\/p>\n

Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019ordonnance sur requ\u00eate, les pi\u00e8ces saisies chez le concurrent \u00e9taient plac\u00e9es sous s\u00e9questre.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pour obtenir la communication des pi\u00e8ces, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Autovision saisissait classiquement le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du TGI Paris pour qu\u2019il ordonne la mainlev\u00e9e du s\u00e9questre.<\/span><\/p>\n

Au cours de cette instance, le concurrent, qui n\u2019avait toujours pas saisi le juge des requ\u00eates d\u2019une \u00e9ventuelle demande de r\u00e9tractation, sollicitait du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, \u00e0 titre reconventionnel, la r\u00e9tractation de l\u2019ordonnance sur requ\u00eate.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ce dernier, estimant qu\u2019une telle mesure relevait effectivement de son pouvoir, statuait sur cette demande (bien que la rejetant), et, par la m\u00eame d\u00e9cision, ordonnait la mainlev\u00e9e du s\u00e9questre.<\/span><\/p>\n

Le concurrent, d\u00e9bout\u00e9 de l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de ses demandes, interjetait appel de cette ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/span><\/p>\n

Devant la cour d\u2019appel, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Autovision sollicitait l\u2019annulation partielle de l\u2019ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir sur la partie relative \u00e0 la r\u00e9tractation, et la confirmation pour le surplus.<\/span><\/p>\n

Si la Cour de Cassation avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 statu\u00e9 dans ce sens, c\u2019\u00e9tait uniquement en mati\u00e8re de saisie-contrefa\u00e7on (Cass. com., 21 octobre 2014, n\u00b013-15435).<\/span><\/p>\n

En revanche, il n\u2019existait aucune d\u00e9cision ant\u00e9rieure \u00e9quivalente rendue sur le fondement de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pour sa part, le concurrent soutenait en appel, comme il le fera \u00e0 nouveau devant la Cour de Cassation, que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s et le juge des requ\u00eates \u00e9tant la m\u00eame personne, \u00e0 savoir le Pr\u00e9sident de la juridiction, il serait artificiel de les distinguer.<\/span><\/p>\n

Toutefois, la cour d\u2019appel, suivi en ce sens par la Cour de Cassation, annulait partiellement pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir l\u2019ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 en relevant que la d\u00e9cision de r\u00e9tractation rel\u00e8ve \u00ab <\/span>de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive du juge qui a rendu l\u2019ordonnance sur requ\u00eate<\/span><\/i>\u00a0\u00bb (CA Paris, 25 octobre 2018, RG n\u00b018\/02635).<\/span><\/p>\n

Par cons\u00e9quent, la r\u00e8gle pos\u00e9e par la Cour de Cassation dans l\u2019arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 du 21 octobre 2014 en mati\u00e8re de saisie-contrefa\u00e7on est d\u00e9sormais plus largement applicable \u00e0 toutes les mesures d\u2019instruction <\/span>in futurum\u00a0<\/span><\/i>avec ce nouvel arr\u00eat de la Haute cour.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Commentaire de la d\u00e9cision de principe de la Cour de Cassation, 19 mars 2020, n\u00b019-11.323 Par une d\u00e9cision de principe du 19 mars 2020 (n\u00b019-11.323), qui fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une triple publication (P+B+I), la Cour de Cassation donne un \u00e9clairage int\u00e9ressant sur la r\u00e9partition des pouvoirs respectifs entre juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s et juge des requ\u00eates : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2094,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[41,45,43,47,46,42,44],"class_list":["post-959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articlespublications-en","tag-article-145-cpc","tag-competence","tag-concurrence-deloyale","tag-juge-des-referes","tag-juge-des-requetes","tag-mesures-dinstruction-in-futurum","tag-preuve"],"yoast_head":"\nPreuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Preuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Commentaire de la d\u00e9cision de principe de la Cour de Cassation, 19 mars 2020, n\u00b019-11.323 Par une d\u00e9cision de principe du 19 mars 2020 (n\u00b019-11.323), qui fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une triple publication (P+B+I), la Cour de Cassation donne un \u00e9clairage int\u00e9ressant sur la r\u00e9partition des pouvoirs respectifs entre juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s et juge des requ\u00eates : […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Lexington\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"supervisor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"supervisor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"supervisor\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/person\/34997a81349aa764c94997490c8d0c57\"},\"headline\":\"Preuve d’actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\"},\"wordCount\":578,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Article 145 CPC\",\"Comp\u00e9tence\",\"Concurrence d\u00e9loyale\",\"Juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s\",\"Juge des requ\u00eates\",\"Mesures d\u2019instruction\u00a0in futurum\",\"Preuve\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Articles & Publications\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\",\"name\":\"Preuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png\",\"width\":330,\"height\":330},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Preuve d’actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/\",\"name\":\"Lexington\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Lexington\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/EBLL_LOGO_COULEUR.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/EBLL_LOGO_COULEUR.svg\",\"width\":472,\"height\":113,\"caption\":\"Lexington\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/person\/34997a81349aa764c94997490c8d0c57\",\"name\":\"supervisor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"supervisor\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/wendevs.com\/lexington\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/author\/supervisor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Preuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Preuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington","og_description":"Commentaire de la d\u00e9cision de principe de la Cour de Cassation, 19 mars 2020, n\u00b019-11.323 Par une d\u00e9cision de principe du 19 mars 2020 (n\u00b019-11.323), qui fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une triple publication (P+B+I), la Cour de Cassation donne un \u00e9clairage int\u00e9ressant sur la r\u00e9partition des pouvoirs respectifs entre juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s et juge des requ\u00eates : […]","og_url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/","og_site_name":"Lexington","article_published_time":"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":330,"height":330,"url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"supervisor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"supervisor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/"},"author":{"name":"supervisor","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/person\/34997a81349aa764c94997490c8d0c57"},"headline":"Preuve d’actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation","datePublished":"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/"},"wordCount":578,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png","keywords":["Article 145 CPC","Comp\u00e9tence","Concurrence d\u00e9loyale","Juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","Juge des requ\u00eates","Mesures d\u2019instruction\u00a0in futurum","Preuve"],"articleSection":["Articles & Publications"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/","url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/","name":"Preuve d'actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation - Lexington","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png","datePublished":"2020-06-18T08:34:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-27T10:35:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/article-placeholder-01.png","width":330,"height":330},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/preuve-d-actes-de-concurrence-deloyale-decision-inedite-de-la-cour-de-cassation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Preuve d’actes de concurrence d\u00e9loyale : d\u00e9cision in\u00e9dite de la Cour de Cassation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/","name":"Lexington","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#organization","name":"Lexington","url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/EBLL_LOGO_COULEUR.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/EBLL_LOGO_COULEUR.svg","width":472,"height":113,"caption":"Lexington"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/#\/schema\/person\/34997a81349aa764c94997490c8d0c57","name":"supervisor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1b34907994b9a5b899c0ad6e5e577bfe75ad3d0794a0491ce9bc42860b420416?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"supervisor"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/wendevs.com\/lexington"],"url":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/author\/supervisor\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=959"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2197,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/959\/revisions\/2197"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2094"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lxt-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}